Page 1 of 8
					
				
				Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 4:38 pm
				by Armok
				i'll try make a few pf them . time  permitting ofc..
p.s  btw  (<disclaimer> this is NOT a flame at all.   but is pre-claiming considered OK  on pryd/hib  for ML raids? ) . cos i have 2-3 toons i need  to get ml's  on and i am considering doing some of my own ML raids in future once i am settles into hib properly.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 4:43 pm
				by Armok
				Rowenna wrote:. 
i have leadalout of ml rushes as a Alb player trow freddys forums some have fallow me there but  as i mowed to hib as aplayer i thought i start a Ml rush here fore hibs and will do alout of times ahead fore you
try bear in mind mate (not a flame) that   some ML's in HIB  i'd imagine are done differently than on alb..   due to different classes  etc etc 

  ... not doubting your ability to lead a raid on hib at all..  just  asking thats all 

 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:54 pm
				by Puppet
				Is it me or is the pre-claiming abit ZzzzzZzzz ?
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:14 pm
				by `Naema
				I guess he needs a new sponsor to copy his pre claimed template of his cleric to Pryd/Hib on his druid  :sheepskip
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:33 pm
				by Puppet
				`Naema wrote:I guess he needs a new sponsor to copy his pre claimed template of his cleric to Pryd/Hib on his druid  :sheepskip
Abit silly considering druids can get a good version of GoV - dont see any reason to use the ML2.10 hauberk then really 

 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 7:28 am
				by Kias
				Puppet wrote:Is it me or is the pre-claiming abit ZzzzzZzzz ?
considering the time and effort you need to put into leading/organising something on this scale theres nothing wrong with it in my opinion.
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 2:21 pm
				by Elrandhir
				Kias wrote:considering the time and effort you need to put into leading/organising something on this scale theres nothing wrong with it in my opinion.
Agrees, and those who don´t lead one yourself instead... have never lead anything major and I don´t intend to, just to lazy and things like this don´t give me any joy... so I think the leaders can preclaim what they want, even though ofcourse less people will probably come to the raids of those preclaiming, I wouldent care though if I got the Encounters or whatever I needed done.
But say 1 item atleast, is more then fair, and if anyone would have any complains about that, if I lead a raid woud just say that... well you don´t need to attend, go make your own raid " Can´t understand how those that have to be so greedy that they can´t let those leeding the raid get this atleast ;D.
1 Item is more then fair anyhow 

 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 2:35 pm
				by Kallima
				Puppet wrote:Is it me or is the pre-claiming abit ZzzzzZzzz ?
I think its ok. If you lead a full master level raid then saying you want to pre claim one item if it drops seems reasonable, and I thought this was a total of four items from ten full raids. Less than one per raid and clearly stated in advance.
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 2:43 pm
				by Elrandhir
				Kallima wrote:I think its ok. If you lead a full master level raid then saying you want to pre claim one item if it drops seems reasonable, and I thought this was a total of four items from ten full raids. Less than one per raid and clearly stated in advance.
Yes, and I think that instead of raidleaders being the ones who are greedy, it's those thinking that the raidleaders shouldent get this, is the ones that are... really "GREEDY".
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 3:40 pm
				by Lieva
				Easy people.
Youll notice i deleted a few posts. dont make me delete those too 
i left the puppet ZzzzZzz remark one in as raid rules like this
Lotto: 
*I decide what is lottoed. 
*Everyone can roll for anything, I couldn't care less.
end up with people flaming each other on the forums later. So this needs to be specified abit clearer.